There's no hyphen between twenty and one; thus, the latter is correct.
Confession: the "exceedingly gay nappy" was added by myself, to retain the G(-)rated nature of Splantrik. I shall rescind, and resend, with a more (i.e. less) appropriate nappy, chosen from the same GIS field.
Technically our GIS was without the 'hyphen' and so the issue of whether these ammeters are twenty in number or 0.21 USD in price is still and open matter.
As for modifying the GIS, well, I'm very concerned. Especially since you didn't declare this at the outset. As for the choice of nappy, again I was disappointed to see the inane smiley face. The remedey is more acceptable, however no nappy should be needed. I'm your only visitor, and I'm not G-rated, so I think we shouldn't be covering up cods. Ah, it appears I've already complained about his happy nappy. How very good of me.
Let me remind you of GIS 'boredom' where we inevitably visualize Hasselhoff's zooming erection. How can that be considered more acceptable than this man's sad sack? You really have some thinking to do, laddy.
7 comments:
Punker "Tessie" Adam Bolton.
Where can I buy 0.21USD ammeters? From this post-showering douche? I don't particularly like his exceedingly gay nappy.
Or are the ammeters 0.01USD each, there being 20 of them?
There's no hyphen between twenty and one; thus, the latter is correct.
Confession: the "exceedingly gay nappy" was added by myself, to retain the G(-)rated nature of Splantrik. I shall rescind, and resend, with a more (i.e. less) appropriate nappy, chosen from the same GIS field.
Ok, fixed.
Technically our GIS was without the 'hyphen' and so the issue of whether these ammeters are twenty in number or 0.21 USD in price is still and open matter.
Looks like pfund, along the same GISy lines,
http://www.electrotherapymuseum.com/Articles/OudinTreatment.jpg
As for modifying the GIS, well, I'm very concerned. Especially since you didn't declare this at the outset. As for the choice of nappy, again I was disappointed to see the inane smiley face. The remedey is more acceptable, however no nappy should be needed. I'm your only visitor, and I'm not G-rated, so I think we shouldn't be covering up cods. Ah, it appears I've already complained about his happy nappy. How very good of me.
Let me remind you of GIS 'boredom' where we inevitably visualize Hasselhoff's zooming erection. How can that be considered more acceptable than this man's sad sack? You really have some thinking to do, laddy.
Yours sincerely,
Vincent Bethell.
employment pasydy ovary hegemony vels improving posthumously arrays choreography cultural paradigms
lolikneri havaqatsu
Post a Comment